Let's apply some Hegelian ideas to approach this crucial theme: when the Lord sexually represses his Slave, the latter's desires gets innerly intensify, analogously to what happens within a pressure cooker. Such an intensification acts upon the whole Slave's mind, but the repressed desire does not die this way, absolutely! Among weakest people, this much increased interior pressure may be enough to destroy mental balance, leading to death or madness.
Nonetheless, whether acting upon stronger people any outside coming sexual repression is able only strengthen the perpetual human wish to freedom, nurturing ideas of flight, of revolt, of joining with peers in order to destroy this so perverse system.
At first, capitalist domination strategic relied on overt sexual repression, until a point in history when it became clear that was a bad business, since any battle against Eros's explosive force must be forever destined to be lost.
Astutely, the capital strategics has entirely reversed its game tactic.
"The uptodate fashion now is to flirt with no clothes at all", a rather sarcastic song said some 15 years ago. There's a mighty commandment to "freeing up" every instinct, allowing people fuck whatever their erotic personal style. Plenty of porn movies everywhere at anytime, available to everyone. Any doubts about it, folk?
Anyone who does not get aroused at seeing couples fucking, even if only on screenshots, is already dead. Don't you think so, reader?
No need to fear any unwanted consequences of copulation, since there are a thousand easy ways of contraception. Whether the odds were against you, and even the morning-after pill didn't solve avoid such a big woe, who has the right to ruin the party and deny the girl's right to interrupt that "invasion of her sacred body" by a mere human fetus?
No need to fear any unwanted consequences of copulation, since there are a thousand easy ways of contraception. Whether the odds were against you, and even the morning-after pill didn't solve avoid such a big woe, who has the right to ruin the party and deny the girl's right to interrupt that "invasion of her sacred body" by a mere human fetus?
Every barrier against sexual freedom is so easy to put down, perhaps because obviously no rational arguments may ever be strong enough to defeat erotic impulses.
Banalizing is the act of taking off any intrinsic value from something, as when turning a human behavior into no more than a matter of trite, repetitive rutine.
Although previously the repressed sexual desire has given building grounds to a reaction against oppressive realities all over the Earth, thus helping to structure mighty revolt feelings and backing the overthrowing of repressor agents and classes, the ongoing sexual banalization seems to serve very well to weaken any possible reaction against the overwhelming domination of private lives by those same oppressive forces, whose main interest is the transformation of all human beings into slave machines, devoids of own identity, just physiologically lasting in a void, meaningless existence.
At first, capitalist domination strategic relied on overt sexual repression, until a point in history when it became clear that was a bad business, since any battle against Eros's explosive force must be forever destined to be lost.
Astutely, the capital strategics has entirely reversed its game tactic.
"The uptodate fashion now is to flirt with no clothes at all", a rather sarcastic song said some 15 years ago. There's a mighty commandment to "freeing up" every instinct, allowing people fuck whatever their erotic personal style. Plenty of porn movies everywhere at anytime, available to everyone. Any doubts about it, folk?
Anyone who does not get aroused at seeing couples fucking, even if only on screenshots, is already dead. Don't you think so, reader?
No need to fear any unwanted consequences of copulation, since there are a thousand easy ways of contraception. Whether the odds were against you, and even the morning-after pill didn't solve avoid such a big woe, who has the right to ruin the party and deny the girl's right to interrupt that "invasion of her sacred body" by a mere human fetus?
No need to fear any unwanted consequences of copulation, since there are a thousand easy ways of contraception. Whether the odds were against you, and even the morning-after pill didn't solve avoid such a big woe, who has the right to ruin the party and deny the girl's right to interrupt that "invasion of her sacred body" by a mere human fetus?
Every barrier against sexual freedom is so easy to put down, perhaps because obviously no rational arguments may ever be strong enough to defeat erotic impulses.
This alleged "liberation" of all sexual impulses surely means their overt banalization, that is, it implies no less than the deprival of any higher sense from human sexuality.
"Everybody must have sex the way he or she wants, without any constraints or frills, whenever and wherver wanted, and that is it!"Banalizing is the act of taking off any intrinsic value from something, as when turning a human behavior into no more than a matter of trite, repetitive rutine.
Although previously the repressed sexual desire has given building grounds to a reaction against oppressive realities all over the Earth, thus helping to structure mighty revolt feelings and backing the overthrowing of repressor agents and classes, the ongoing sexual banalization seems to serve very well to weaken any possible reaction against the overwhelming domination of private lives by those same oppressive forces, whose main interest is the transformation of all human beings into slave machines, devoids of own identity, just physiologically lasting in a void, meaningless existence.
Sexual desire belongs to the sacred essence of human beings!
To empty the meaningful essence of sexual functions is to turn them into mere physiological events, as banal as to pee or to poo. Hence we are allowed to talk of our times as dominated by 'sexual nihilism':
Mankind is in a process of destroying its own and sacred sexuality into NOTHING!
No comments:
Post a Comment
The author looks forward to reading your comments!
O autor aguarda seus valiosos comentários, leitor.