First human organized groups appeared concurrently with the first religions and
laws, undoubtedly needed to mitigate the unavoidable suffering from
confrontations emerging amidst human beings.
Yet, taming the more animalistic aspect of Homo sapiens is a feat worthy of Sisyphus, that mythological character whose
punishment consists of carrying a tremendously heavy rock uphill. Once it
reaches the summit, it always rolls back down, forcing him to repeat the same
effort. And this up-and-down motion repeats itself eternally. Just as gravity pulls that boulder downward, human
desires, when muzzled, repressed, and suppressed, never lose strength. On the
contrary, when subject to opposing forces they often get stronger.
Up to a certain point in History, people believe there is a reward in the
afterlife for living a righteous life, on the grounds that the pains of earthly
existence will cease for the "good and pious," provided they resign
themselves to the nonsensical hedonistic excesses of this ephemeral world.
Then, in those faith times, Heaven, Hell, and Providence guaranteed that
those who managed to live without sin would be rewarded in the afterlife. Since
the Renaissance, however, this idea of a
rewarding afterlife has no longer been taken seriously. Just that is what Nietzsche refers to when Zarathustra announces that "God is dead."
In a popularized Schopenhauer's metaphor human social
interaction is analogous to porcupine's crowding to heat each other in
hard winter. Sooner or later proximity causes bloody stings.
For us, thorns come from conflicting desires among group members, since most
wants are never fully complementary to others, except for brief periods of
shared illusions.
Nowadays, the afterlife is no longer enough to give meaning to the concrete,
inevitable sufferings of life, nor is it even enough to make existence more
bearable. Peace is only ensured by denial, through the radical rejection of
everything that can generate conflict, frustration, and pain. Perfect days
cannot involve romantic involvement, attachment to people, the desire to
compete, the pursuit of money, family relationships, or professional ambition.
Everything that can bring pleasure is risky, generating conflict and painful
wounds, often lethal in the short or long term. Therefore, perfection can only
come from settling for peace. A true and lasting peace, hardly distinguishable
from the peace of cemeteries.
Brazilian literature offers us an aphorism related to Hirayama's choices:Riobaldo Tatarana, from "Grande Sertão: Veredas," by the great
philosophizing writer João Guimarães Rosa, says:
"Living is very dangerous!"
From this truth, the choice of the "last human" [letzter Mensch] from "Thus Spoke
Zarathustra," a figure Hirayama perfectly embodies, is to escape all
dangers. He simply persists on Earth in terrible solitude, devoid of any
expectations.

No comments:
Post a Comment
The author appreciates your interest in this blog!
Whether you think our work deserves your support, the PIX key is: mwag18@gmail.com
O autor agradece seu interesse por este blog!
Tê-lo como leitor é um privilégio! E, caso possa contribuir com nossa linha de pesquisa independente, nossa chave PIX é: mwag18@gmail.com
L'autore apprezza affatto il tuo interesse per questo blog!
Se ritieni che il nostro lavoro meriti il tuo supporto, la chiave PIX è: mwag18@gmail.com